Customer influence policy
The aim of the focus groups were to consider some of the following:
- What decisions you feel you should be involved in?
- How we make your voice heard by our Board?
- What barriers stop customers from getting involved?
Here are a few things that we learnt:
- Accessibility - It was important that the customer voice is as representative as possible. All groups that took part in the session felt that we should offer quick and easy ways to engage.
- Variety - Participants were in favour of the variety of surveys/methods that we offer, and, in some cases, wanted to see more.
- Proactivity - Customers responded positively to the way we monitor services using transactional / perception surveys and regular reporting.
- Transparency and communication - In situations where customers didn’t feel motivated to influence our actions, they wanted to be kept informed.
How we got your feedback
Who?
Our Customer Community network - find out more about them here
When?
February 2022
How?
Customer focus group meetings
So, what we did...
- We changed our policy to include more on accessibility and the subjects customers are most interested in.
- We are working with our Community Development Manager to explore how we can use summer events to gather feedback.
- We are looking for ways to increase awareness of our ‘You said, we did’ articles and information on our website.
- Alongside carrying out customer tenancy audits - where we will be checking in on customers who we haven't heard from in the last two years.
- Advertise our Board member vacancies to our customers.
- Created a 'suggestion log' for all the comments and feedback we get informally. We'll review all these ideas once a year to see if there are any themes coming through that we can take forward.
What we going to do....
- Test whether offering vouchers or incentives will encourage more people to get involved.
- Try to recruit new Board members who have lived in social housing.
- Our Board are looking into how customers can hold them to account more effectively. They looked at scrutiny panels and committees but weren't sure these were the